Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civil Rights Discrimination topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts changes to Colorado anti‑discrimination remedies after hours of debate
Summary
The House approved House Bill 12-39 to modify remedy provisions under Colorado's anti‑discrimination law, including a cap on emotional‑distress damages and technical fixes; supporters said it fills a federal gap, opponents warned it will increase litigation risk for businesses.
The Colorado House on March 31 approved House Bill 12‑39, a package of changes to remedy provisions in the Colorado Anti‑Discrimination Act that includes a $50,000 cap on certain emotional‑distress damages and several technical edits. The bill passed on third reading by a recorded roll call.
The measure, championed by Representative Zocai, was presented as a state‑level response to federal court changes that narrowed remedies available under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Representative Zocai said the bill aims to provide a practical remedy when a business denies access because of a disability: “If you see a sign in a window that says, ‘no Jews allowed, or no Mexicans or dogs allowed,’ that is real harm, and it deserves a real remedy,” she told colleagues.
Supporters said the change narrows exposure for businesses compared with the remedies that existed before a recent Supreme Court decision, while restoring a state pathway for compensatory damages. “This is not a new exposure to businesses,” Representative Zocai said during floor remarks, adding the bill caps damages at $50,000 and was stakeholdered with business groups.
Opponents urged caution, arguing the bill imposes new liabilities and removes due‑process protections for some businesses. Representative DeGraaf said lawmakers must be careful about unintended effects on small enterprises: “I think everybody's against discrimination ... But what we're looking at here ... is we're looking at making sure that we're not looking to expand the options” in ways that could harm small businesses, he said.
The House also approved a brief grammatical third‑reading amendment (L14) that members said fixed drafting errors. The motion for final passage carried with 40 yes, 24 no and 1 excused.
The bill's supporters pointed to stakeholder negotiations during committee and floor debate as evidence that the measure balances the interests of people who experience discrimination and businesses. Opponents said they will continue seeking changes in the Senate, including a cure period and adjustments to caps and interaction with common‑law torts.
With the vote, HB12‑39 moves to the Senate for further consideration.
Ending: The House debate underscored the split between legislators who urged a state backstop for federal limits on damages and those who warned the proposal will encourage more litigation and strain small businesses. The Senate will now take up the bill.
