Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Salaries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Township council restores 2% across-the-board raises after debate over 1.5% proposal
Summary
At a Township of Washington budget meeting, council members debated reducing noncontractual salary increases from 2% to 1.5% before voting to restore the 2% increase for most positions; contractual lines (police, DPW) and several individual positions remained excluded or had different adjustments.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Salaries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Township of Washington council members debated changes to the proposed salary ordinance during a review of the 2025 budget and ultimately approved a 2% across-the-board increase for most noncontractual positions.
The discussion began when Administrator DeCarlo walked the council through the salary tables and noted that most lines were budgeted at 2%, while a small number of positions had higher requested increases. Councilman Cascio moved to make a uniform 1.5% increase for noncontractual positions; a colleague seconded the motion and the council proceeded through line-item adjustments under that assumption during the budget review.
The proposal drew sharp comments from other members. Several council members and speakers argued that the half-point difference was small in short-term savings but could affect employees’ retention and morale. Administrator DeCarlo repeatedly explained which lines already differed from 2% and why: the purchasing/payroll line, a deputy treasurer/benefits coordinator position, and a civilian police position were budgeted at higher amounts due to role-specific requests and partial-year funding in 2024.
After line-by-line review, a separate motion was made to restore raises to 2% for the affected salary lines. The council held a roll-call vote: Councilman Casio voted no; Councilman Sears voted yes; Councilman Ullman voted no; Councilwoman Velez voted yes; Council President DeSantis voted yes. The motion to restore 2% carried.
Nut graf: The council’s choice affects town employees’ pay and the municipal budget baseline. While some members framed a 1.5% raise as modest savings, others said the difference risked losing experienced staff. The final action maintained the administration’s recommended 2% baseline for most noncontractual positions while preserving separate treatment for contractual and specially budgeted lines.
Details and clarifications - Positions excluded or handled separately: contractual police department lines and DPW collective-bargaining items were not changed by the council’s across-the-board decisions; those remain subject to contract terms. (Source: Administrator DeCarlo.) - Exceptions to the 2% baseline: Administrator DeCarlo identified three lines with higher requested increases — purchasing/payroll, deputy treasurer/benefits coordinator, and a civilian police position — and explained some line increases reflected funding for only part of 2024, requiring a larger 2025 budgeted amount to fund a full year. (Source: Administrator DeCarlo.) - Floating/part-time staffing: the “floating” tax office assistant positions are part-time (one at 20 hours/week, another at 16 hours/week); one of those lines’ increases reflected funding a full year after a prior vacancy. (Source: Administrator DeCarlo.)
Outcome and next steps - Formal action recorded: council approved restoring the proposed raises to 2% for most noncontractual positions by roll-call vote (yes: Sears, Velez, DeSantis; no: Casio, Ullman). The administration will carry the 2% figures into the salary ordinance to be introduced for the council’s formal adoption process. - The council and administration agreed to circulate the full salary ordinance before first reading so members can review exact lines and exemptions.
Ending: The council proceeded to complete the budget line review after the vote; additional budget and capital items remained on the agenda.

