Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves rezoning to AEU for Fairpoint Lane lot, adds condition limiting animals to REU standards
Summary
Council approved rezoning 3.62 acres on Fairpoint Lane from REU to AEU to allow a permanent manufactured home accessory dwelling, but added a condition that any keeping of animals on the property conform to REU (residential estate) standards after neighbors and petitioners raised concerns about livestock and spot zoning.
Melbourne City Council on first reading approved an ordinance to change zoning for 3.62 acres on Fairpoint Lane from REU (rural estate use) to AEU (agricultural estate use), with an additional council condition limiting animal keeping to the more restrictive REU standards.
The property owner requested the rezoning so a manufactured home placed on the parcel as a temporary accessory dwelling can remain permanently while the owner constructs a principal single-family residence. City staff described the request as consistent with surrounding large-lot, rural residential uses and noted the planning-and-zoning board unanimously recommended approval.
Multiple neighbors and a gated subdivision homeowners association urged council to deny the rezoning, arguing the change would permit farm-style operations (chickens, hogs, cattle) that would be out of character and harm property values. Attorney David Dyer told council the request amounted to spot zoning and asked whether commercial-scale agriculture could be allowed. Staff replied most commercial agricultural uses in AEU require far larger acreage (for example, 40 acres for commercial agriculture; 10 acres for a hog farm), and said the narrow access road and lot size would practically prevent larger commercial operations.
Council added an explicit condition to the ordinance that "the keeping of animals on the property shall conform to the REU standards for that activity," a measure intended to preserve neighborhood character. The motion passed on roll call 5–2: Council members Bassett, Kennedy, LaRusso, Newman and Mayor Alfrey voted yes; Hanley and Smith voted no.
A petition opposing the rezoning had been filed by nearby residents; staff said if petitioners reach the 20% threshold of owners within 500 feet the second-reading vote would require a six-of-seven vote to adopt the rezoning. Staff will tabulate the petition and report back at second reading if the 20% threshold is met.
