Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Demolition Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
ARB denies demolition request for 520 North Sixth Avenue contributing house
Summary
The board refused an application to demolish the Gates Daniel House, a contributing Second Empire structure at 520 North Sixth Avenue, finding applicants did not present clear and convincing evidence of unreasonable hardship and noting community interest in preserving the structure.
The Pensacola Architectural Review Board on March 20 denied a demolition request for the Gates Daniel House at 520 North Sixth Avenue, a 1892 Second Empire–style contributing structure in the Old East Hill Preservation District.
Adrianne Walker explained the code standard: demolition of a contributing structure requires the applicant to demonstrate clear and convincing evidence of unreasonable economic hardship, or unusual and compelling circumstances, under the land development code (section 12‑3.10.1 as cited in the application). Adore Properties, represented by founder Steven Seibold, sought permission to demolish the house and subdivide the lot for two new residential structures.
Seibold told the board his company initially went under contract expecting a renovation, but multiple contractor inspections and a specialist’s review concluded the interior structural condition — including foundation and rafters, mold and fire damage and disintegrating brick piers — made restoration infeasible in the developer’s assessment. Adore offered to sell the house separately if a buyer wanted to restore it.
Multiple neighbors and preservation advocates spoke in opposition. Speakers described the house as unique within the district and urged the board to preserve it; several said viable restoration approaches existed and provided contractor cost estimates or firsthand experience restoring nearby properties. Jonathan Bilby, building inspections director, told the board he had inspected the exterior and found no condition that met the city’s unsafe structure criteria; he said he had not performed a formal interior inspection. Board members, after hearing testimony from applicants, building‑department staff and neighbors, concluded that the applicant had not demonstrated the required clear and convincing evidence of unreasonable hardship and voted to deny the demolition application (motion and second recorded; vote recorded as denial under section 12‑3.10.1).
The board noted the applicant may reconfigure plans or attempt to sell the house separately; staff said the related conceptual proposal for new construction on the site would not be heard following denial. The board’s denial keeps the Gates Daniel House designated as a contributing structure and denies the demolition recommendation to city council.
