Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance And Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Baxter council approves consent agenda, adopting multiple resolutions and routine items
Summary
At its March 4 meeting Baxter City Council approved the consent agenda in a single motion, adopting several resolutions to order and approve municipal improvement projects, accepting commission minutes, approving sale and plat actions, and authorizing payment of bills and minutes.
Baxter City Council on March 4 approved its consent agenda in a single motion, carrying multiple routine items and resolutions without separate roll-call votes.
The consent agenda included approval of council work session minutes and regular meeting minutes from Feb. 18, 2025, special meeting minutes from Feb. 20, 2025, payment of bills and the finance report, acceptance of Parks and Trails Commission minutes from Feb. 25, 2025, and several resolutions authorizing engineering and bidding steps for municipal projects.
Resolutions listed on the consent agenda and approved included: Resolution No. 2025-025 ordering improvements and preparing plans for the 2025 Design Road and 371 Stormwater Improvements (municipal project 4135); Resolution No. 2025-026 ordering improvements for the 2025 Commercial Full Depth Reclamation Improvements Project (municipal project 4425); Resolution No. 2025-027 approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the 2025 Commercial Full Depth Reclamation Improvements Project (municipal project 4425); Resolution No. 2025-028 approving the sale of Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Seating Second Edition and authorizing the mayor to execute related documents; and Resolution No. 2025-029 approving the final plat of Common Interest Community No. 1088, Fairview Aquas Park 6 supplemental CIC plat. The consent agenda also included authorization to approve a placement at South Dale Park in the amount of $142,751.30.
A council member moved to approve the consent agenda and another seconded; the council responded “Aye” and the mayor (or presiding officer) declared the motion carried. No member recorded opposition on the consent items during the meeting recording.
Because the items were passed on the consent agenda, none were debated separately at the March 4 meeting; any member or attendee had the option to pull items for separate consideration but did not do so.
