Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Recycling Grant topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council accepts curbside recycling grant after debate over contamination and costs
Summary
Wilmington City Council accepted a Clinton County Solid Waste District curbside recycling grant and declared an emergency; council and staff debated contamination, program cost and whether to move from opt-out to opt-in service.
Wilmington City Council voted unanimously on (date not specified) to accept a curbside recycling grant from the Clinton County Solid Waste District and declared the measure an emergency to allow immediate implementation.
Service Director Crow presented usage and cost information and warned the council that contamination of curbside recycling has reduced the value of many collected materials and increased downstream costs. Crow said the city pays roughly $42 per ton to Rumpke to accept material and that, after labor, fuel and equipment costs, past calculations had shown the curbside program could cost the city roughly $270,000 annually.
Council members debated program design. Councilman Wells and others said residents are passionate about recycling; several members suggested switching from an opt-out to an opt-in model or charging a modest monthly fee for curbside service so that participants who recycle correctly cover program costs. Councilman Wells moved the grant acceptance and the motion was seconded and carried on a roll call vote.
Why it matters: accepting the grant provides short-term funding to offset disposal costs and keeps the curbside program running while the city continues to evaluate long-term options.
Vote: Resolution 25-01 (Accepting grant from the Clinton County Solid Waste District for curbside recycling and declaring an emergency) was moved by Councilman Wells, seconded by (recorded second), and passed by roll call; recorded affirmative votes included Schleyball, Snarr, Wells, Osborne, Stanstedt, Oliver and Slabaugh.
Ending: Council accepted the grant and asked staff to return with definitive cost figures and options for program design before future budget decisions.
