Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the College Access topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kansas board committee approves Oct. 6–8, 2025 free-application days; staff to track yield

2824243 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A Kansas Board of Regents academic committee approved three unified free-application days for Oct. 6–8, 2025 and directed staff and campus enrollment officers to monitor yields and application behavior before recommending whether the event should continue as an annual practice.

The Board of Regents academic committee approved a staff recommendation to hold a three-day statewide free-application window Oct. 6–8, 2025, aiming to make it easier for Kansas students to apply to multiple public institutions.

Misty Knox, a staff member presenting the agenda item, summarized the board office and provosts’ review of a pilot, saying the provosts and enrollment managers recommended “the Kansas free application days continue on the dates that were consistent with 2024.”

The committee’s nut graf: the approval preserves a consistent three-day window so campuses can measure application-to-matriculation yield over time rather than treat each event as a one-off. Provost Nickelmeier, speaking for campus enrollment officials, told the committee that maintaining the same three-day window each year is important “so that we can monitor year over year performance and see what the impact is because what we need to see is the real yield rate.”

Committee members pressed for clarity on what the group will measure. Regent Prossker asked whether the reported uptick in applications — described in the staff materials as roughly a 30% increase in application-day traffic for 2023 — represented a lasting change or only a short-term spike. Knox and the provosts said systemwide 2024 yield data were not yet available for that comparison and that another year of tracking is needed to assess matriculation and retention impacts.

Discussion also covered how campuses should encourage students to apply responsibly. The provosts asked that counselors and application counselors encourage students to apply to two or three institutions they are seriously considering rather than every campus, to reduce administrative duplication and processing burden. The provosts emphasized the system would not block students from applying to more schools; the suggestion is to reduce unnecessary processing work at admissions offices.

Committee members and campus representatives discussed other fee-waiver mechanisms already used on campuses. One committee member said many institutions allow applicants to request application fee waivers through their application or student portal; Jill, a university representative, cautioned that a survey question asking whether the free-application dates mattered might not isolate the effect of the unified event because individual campuses run other fee-waiver or free-application initiatives.

The committee voted to approve the October 6–8, 2025 dates for the statewide free-application days. The staff recommendation approved by the committee covered the single 2025 set of dates with the intent to reassess after additional yield and matriculation data are collected.

The committee directed staff to continue collecting and reporting application, admission and matriculation data and to consider straightforward ways — such as one survey question on the student intake form — to help trace whether a student’s application was driven by the free-application event.

Votes at a glance: • Motion to approve the minutes from the Feb. 26 BASC meeting — approved (ayes recorded). • Motion to approve Apply Kansas pre-application days, Oct. 6–8, 2025 — approved (ayes recorded).

What happens next: staff and campus enrollment teams will continue to monitor application, admission and matriculation (yield) metrics and report back to the committee after additional data are available. The committee said it expects staff to present more complete yield information before deciding whether to make the dates a recurring annual event.