Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Space topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission forwards open‑space and pathways text changes after clarifying edits
Summary
The commission unanimously recommended that Town Council approve amendments to open‑space and pathway standards in the Land Management Ordinance, keeping language that applies open‑space rules to expanded minor subdivisions and preserving discretion for reasonable rules and regulations after public comment.
Staff described an LMO text amendment that revises how common open space and pathways are identified and regulated for subdivisions. The draft presented to the commission retained a provision (section 16.5104.b.2) clarifying that open‑space standards apply when a minor subdivision is expanded so that the total number of lots exceeds five; staff recommended keeping that language rather than striking it. The amendment also revised standards to require that common open space be visually identifiable by design elements “including but not limited to” signage, fencing, landscape buffers, trail systems, pools, sports facilities or lawns. Finally, staff recommended retaining a provision that common open space may be “subject to reasonable rules and regulations,” noting that certain amenities (pools, ballfields) may appropriately have hours, age restrictions or other constraints.
A public commenter, Chester Williams, asked who would set the “reasonable rules and regulations,” suggested the town explicitly reference rules promulgated by homeowners’ associations (HOAs), and pressed staff on language that used “may” versus “shall” when describing an official’s discretion to prefer sidewalks over pathways. Williams said recorded HOA rules are often part of public land records and urged that the code be specific if it is intended to permit HOA rules to govern access. Staff responded that the repeated use of “reasonable” in the LMO is intended to preserve necessary flexibility and that “may” was used deliberately to allow discretion in individual circumstances.
Commissioner discussion was brief. A motion was made and seconded to recommend Town Council approve the amendment set; the commission voted unanimously to forward the recommendation.
