Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Engagement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission backs broader public-notice radius for planning hearings; staff to work through mailing logistics

2822219 · March 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council increase the public-notice radius for hearing mailings from 500 feet to approximately a quarter-mile (1,320 feet) to improve transparency for large-lot properties; staff noted higher postage costs and suggested exploring future electronic notification options.

The Planning Commission recommended 4-0 March 6 that the City Council adopt an amendment to the city code expanding public-notice mailing requirements for planning hearings from the existing 500-foot radius to 1,320 feet (one-quarter mile).

Staff said expanding the radius would notify more property owners in rural portions of Dayton whose lots are large enough that a 500-foot buffer may miss nearby landowners with an interest in a project. Jason (city staff) and commissioners said the change would increase transparency for large-lot areas and better capture affected stakeholders.

Staff cautioned that the change increases postage and staff workload: one recent project’s mailings cost roughly $500 in postage under current practices; expanding to a quarter mile would raise those costs proportionally. Staff suggested the city could consider collecting email addresses for future electronic notices, but noted state statute currently governs mailed-notice requirements and that property-owner mailing remains the legal baseline.

Commissioners asked staff to examine whether applicants should bear added mailing expense and whether duplicate mailings could be de-duplicated for cost savings. The commission voted to forward the proposed code amendment to council for consideration; staff said the ordinance would appear on the March 25 council agenda.