Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Absentee Ballot Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee introduces RS32734 to add inside-envelope ID checks for absentee ballots
Summary
The committee introduced RS32734, which would change absentee ballot processing by requiring identifying information (driver's license or ID number, last four of Social Security, date of birth) on an inner envelope so clerks can verify voters before opening ballots; sponsors estimate a $4,000 cost.
The State Affairs Committee introduced RS32734 after a presentation from Representative Mike Moyo (District 10) explaining a proposal to change the absentee ballot envelope process so that clerks could verify a voter's identity without exposing identifying information to the public.
Under the RS as presented, voters returning absentee ballots would place the voted ballot in a sealed inner envelope and place that inside an outer envelope that includes identifying data the clerk would use during verification. The bill would require voters to include a signature plus an identifier such as the voter's driver's license or state ID number, the last four digits of the voter's Social Security number and the voter's date of birth. Representative Moyo said the change is intended to ensure "whoever sends that thing back in is the person that's supposed to vote in that ballot."
Supporters and cost Representative Moyo told the committee the measure is designed to prevent misuse of absentee ballots and estimated a one-time implementation cost of about $4,000 to accommodate the new envelope process.
Questions and concerns Several committee members questioned operational impacts and the risk of unintentionally disenfranchising voters: - Representative Alfieri asked whether the clerks would open additional envelopes earlier to accommodate the change; the sponsor said clerks would still not open the ballot itself before election day but could examine identifying information on the inner envelope for verification. - Representative Nicholson and Representative Keeley expressed concern that additional identity fields and stricter verification could increase clerks' workload and create false negatives if data does not match registration records. - Representative Barbieri asked whether clerks already collect Social Security information; the sponsor clarified the bill would require only the last four digits of the Social Security number, which many registrants have provided previously.
Committee action The committee introduced RS32734 and placed it on the second-reading calendar. Committee members asked the Secretary of State's office and county clerks to coordinate implementation details, including whether two or three-envelope handling would be needed and how the inner envelope information would be protected from public view prior to tabulation.
Next steps RS32734 was introduced to the second-reading calendar. Committee members signaled the need for further vetting with county clerks on operational details and verification procedures before floor action.
