Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Antisemitism Resolution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee returns antisemitism resolution to sponsor after substitute motions and questions about scope
Summary
RS 32,552, a resolution concerning antisemitism, was introduced but committee members raised concerns about singling out groups and First Amendment implications. Substitute motions were proposed to add protected classes and ultimately an amended substitute motion to return the resolution to the sponsor carried.
Brent Crane introduced RS 32,552 on behalf of Representative Ehart (who could not attend) as a measure addressing antisemitism in Idaho. Crane said sponsor Ehart had drafted a definition of antisemitism and wanted to ensure Jewish residents know they are welcome in the state.
Committee members raised several concerns during discussion. Representative Barbieri said singling out a group for special welcoming language could be problematic because "everyone is welcomed in Idaho." Representative Hosteller and others questioned how the resolution would interact with First Amendment protections and existing anti‑discrimination law; Representative Achilles asked why religion is not already covered by the Human Rights Act.
Representative Achilles moved a substitute to add the phrases "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" (as read from the transcript) to the section listing protected categories. Later, Representative Scogg offered an amended substitute motion to return RS 32,552 to the sponsor for further work, saying the measure "needs too much work" and expressing concern about isolating groups. The committee voted to return the resolution to the sponsor; the chair declared the motion carried on voice vote.
The transcript shows that members wanted a fuller hearing on the measure’s scope and potential edits before the committee proceeds.
