Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Outcomes Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves fence warrant, tables code change and records mixed results on development plan
Summary
At its Jan. 28 meeting the Rowlett Planning and Zoning Commission handled consent minutes, approved a fence warrant, tabled a proposed nonconforming‑structure ordinance to Feb. 25 and did not approve a development plan with warrants for a Merritt Road site.
The Rowlett Planning and Zoning Commission took several additional actions and procedural steps at its Jan. 28 meeting that officials and residents should note:
Minutes and consent The commission approved the Jan. 14, 2025 minutes on the consent agenda. Motion to approve (moved by Commissioner Pollard; seconded by Commissioner Wilson) passed with a recorded tally of 5 in favor, 0 opposed and 2 abstentions.
Fence warrant (Item 4c) The commission approved a warrant to allow a six‑foot wooden side yard fence along Castle Drive and Edna Place at 8922 Edna Place in the Form‑Based New Neighborhood district. Staff said the lot sits behind an existing metal picket fence and the applicant sought a full wood privacy fence for safety and privacy. Commissioners voted to approve the 6‑foot wood fence (motion by Commissioner Hernandez; seconded by Commissioner Crowley); the motion passed unanimously.
Code amendment on nonconforming accessory structures (Item 4e) The commission opened discussion on proposed amendments to Chapter 77‑900 (nonconformities) that would create a limited exception for certain accessory structures built during a prior period when permit guidance was unclear. Commissioners raised questions about terminology and implementation language and asked for a clearer draft. A motion to table the item to a date‑certain carried 7–0; the item was tabled to Feb. 25, 2025, to allow staff and the city attorney to refine the ordinance language and return with clarifications.
Development plan with warrants (Item 4d) A proposed development plan for a 3.26‑acre site on Merritt Road that would have paired a Montessori school with townhomes and required multiple warrants did not receive approval. The commission entertained a motion to approve the development plan with warrants (moved by Commissioner Crowley; seconded by Commissioner Hernandez) but the motion failed on the commission’s vote.
Meeting close and next steps The meeting record shows these items will be reflected in the transmittal to city council where required (SUPs and rezoning recommendations), and the tabled code amendment will be returned to the Planning & Zoning Commission on Feb. 25 for further consideration.
