Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Project topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County discusses erection of steel-frame building; contractor commitment noted
Summary
County staff said the county has an existing steel-frame building and the current agenda item covers erection/assembly; staff recommended the contractor commit up to $25,000 for related work or slab preparation, with final details and site/ward placement to be clarified.
County staff reported the county already owns a steel-frame building and the agenda item addressed erecting the structure. Staff said the current request covers erection costs, with one speaker recommending placement in Ward 2 and asking the contractor to commit a maximum of $25,000 toward the project.
A staff member said the county already has the building and that the current action is for the erection of that structure. The recommendation included a site suggestion (“be in Ward 2”) and a request that the contractor “commit the $25,000 max that's, committed to the …” as part of the project; transcript excerpts indicate the speaker recommended moving forward with the court-related facility work.
No final procurement award or signed contract was recorded in the provided transcript excerpt; staff comments recommended proceeding and named a contractor by surname in discussion. County staff also noted vendor availability and site-preparation needs; specifics on the slab, permitting or timelines were not provided in the excerpt.
