Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Resources Green Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Water-resources briefing urges continued green infrastructure, flags local stream impacts
Summary
A regular water-resources update noted small streams in Hiram are vulnerable to bacteria and sediment impacts, highlighted state buffer rules and the city’s MS4 compliance, and advocated low‑impact development and rain‑garden approaches.
Get email alerts on the Water Resources Green Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the City of Hiram’s March meeting, a water-resources presenter reviewed drinking-water, wastewater and stormwater responsibilities and urged expanded use of green infrastructure and low‑impact development techniques.
The presenter (identified in the transcript as Ms. Fox) said Hiram sits on many small headwater streams that connect to larger creeks and ultimately the Chattahoochee River, and she summarized monitoring results that show elevated bacteria and sediment in some local streams. She said Licklog Creek had elevated bacteria in a 2020 survey and that in 2022–24 additional reaches, including parts of Mill Creek and upstream segments, were identified as impacted for bacteria or sediment in state data. The presenter cautioned the city does not currently conduct routine stream monitoring itself.
Ms. Fox noted regulatory frameworks the city must follow, including the Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District requirements and the city’s responsibilities under its MS4 (municipal separate storm sewer) permit program. She told the council the state conducted an audit of the city’s stormwater program and that the city’s annual reports and inspection procedures “looked good.”
On buffers and low‑impact practices, the presenter reminded the council that the state requires a 25‑foot buffer and that Hiram applies a 50‑foot buffer for new development (with an additional 25 feet making 75 feet with restrictions on impervious surfaces). She described green‑infrastructure examples — rain gardens, permeable pavement, vegetated swales and underground detention cells — and showed local installations (including a rain garden at the memorial and cells used by recent commercial projects).
“Water is life,” Ms. Fox said, and she encouraged continued implementation of green infrastructure, saying the city has been a local leader on several projects and should keep enforcing buffer and stormwater rules on new development. Council members asked follow-up questions about enforcement and stream monitoring.
The presentation was informational; no regulatory changes or formal votes were taken during the meeting.
The council thanked staff for the report and noted the city will continue to respond to state letters about stream buffers and the stormwater program.

