Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission discusses Sarlatan Falls pocket park grant: prefers heavier fencing for overlook, will prioritize kiosk and historical signage

2814749 · January 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The planning commission reviewed a federal grant application for the Sarlatan Falls Pocket Park, discussed trail routing and ADA access, and favored specifying a heavier steel railing for a cliffside overlook because of safety and longevity concerns.

Staff and volunteers asked the planning commission to support a federal grant application for a Sarlatan Falls Pocket Park that would fund trails, an ADA-compliant overlook, a riverside trail, informational signage and an access/parking area.

Barbara (surname not specified), who led the presentation, said the grant is federal funding (described in the meeting as federal money) and that the application materials and an updated trail map were distributed to commissioners. She described three trails — an ADA-accessible Overlook Trail, a short Riverview Trail and a steeper Falls Trail to the fishing access — and said the application will focus on the parcel along Simons and the river. "We named it the Riverview Trail," she said of the riverside route.

Commissioners discussed fence material and safety at the overlook where the old Route 4 right-of-way drops off to a cliff. Barbara presented contractor quotes used to estimate costs and told the commission that, for the roughly 50 linear feet of railing needed (with return 'wings' on each end), vendor estimates yielded preliminary totals of about $4,000 for wood, $3,500 for aluminum, $9,500 for lighter-duty steel and about $11,005 for heavy-duty steel for the fence segment (figures provided at the meeting and attributed to the vendor quotes). She said the grant program caps awards at $50,000 and that the town must provide a 20% match; she noted the town could meet the match with in-kind labor for site clearing and similar work.

Commission members emphasized safety and longevity. Mike Rowe and Mary Ashcroft (participants in the park planning) and other commissioners argued that a robust railing at the overlook is a liability and safety priority. One commissioner summarized: "It would be nice to have it be heavy duty," citing expected longevity and reduced maintenance. Commissioners agreed the kiosk and historical signage are desirable but that signs are easier and cheaper to replace over time than a failed overlook railing.

The commission asked staff to refine the budget and to solicit at least one or two additional contractor estimates; staff said the initial application budget totaled roughly $31,000 before adding higher-end fence options. Commissioners agreed to prioritize the fence and kiosk in the application and to explore supplemental town funding or amendments if the awarded grant requires different line items. Several local historical groups have submitted letters of support and staff will continue to coordinate design, contractor pricing and a project manager role (Mike Rowe indicated he would serve as project manager if needed).