Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Workforce topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Education Committee votes 9-5 to introduce RS 32,776, sending it to second-reading calendar
Summary
The House Committee on Education on March 27, 2025 voted 9-5 to introduce RS 32,776 and recommend it for the second-reading calendar after debate over changes to the state''s Launch workforce program and the role of its advisory board.
Get email alerts on the Education Workforce topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The House Committee on Education voted 9-5 on March 27, 2025 to introduce RS 32,776 and recommend that it be placed on the second-reading calendar.
Chairman Pickett opened the meeting and the committee took up RS 32,776, with Representative Steve Miller (R., Legislative District 24) presenting the draft and saying it contained "just very brief changes" from the prior version. Miller said attendees had had a chance to review the updates and that "those are the only changes made."
The committee considered a substitute motion to return the measure to the sponsor (to send it to general orders), but that substitute failed on a roll call, 4 in favor and 10 against. After the substitute failed, the committee voted to introduce RS 32,776 and recommend it for placement on the second-reading calendar; the chair announced the final count as 9 in favor and 5 opposed.
Members' comments focused on the scope of the Launch program referenced in the resolution and the advisory board's role. Representative Marmon said he "would love to see us going a lot further" but that he would support the RS as presented. Representative Clow characterized the package as "a big improvement," noting the advisory board would not supplant the Workforce Development Council and saying he had read the relevant sections in full. Representative Garner argued the program "was never supposed to send money to people to get masters and doctorate degrees" and urged limiting the program's primary distributions to bachelor-level training unless excess funds were available.
Representative Sauter said he preferred to make additional changes now rather than postpone them to a future session. Representative Marvin commented that his preferred changes applied to the Launch program itself, not the resolution under consideration, and described proposals he has discussed elsewhere, including converting some awards from grants to repayable loans and adding residency requirements for recipients so Idaho would recover funds if recipients leave the state.
Procedural steps during the meeting included acceptance of previous minutes and a roll-call vote on the substitute motion, followed by the roll-call vote on the main motion to introduce the RS. The committee chair concluded business and adjourned at about 9:11 a.m.
Votes at a glance
- Substitute motion (to return RS 32,776 to sponsor / send to general orders): failed, 4 in favor, 10 opposed (roll call taken). - Main motion (introduce RS 32,776; recommend placement on second-reading calendar with a do-pass recommendation): adopted, 9 in favor, 5 opposed (roll call taken).
