Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Religious Expression In Schools topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House committee hears bill to post notice of students27 and employees27 religious-expression rights in schools

2813721 · March 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Rep. John Black told the committee House Bill 1262 would require public schools to publish a brief notice informing students and employees of their constitutional rights to religious expression and to reference existing Missouri law that prohibits discrimination based on religious viewpoint.

Rep. John Black (House District 129) told the House Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education that House Bill 1262, titled the Missouri Religious Liberty in Schools Awareness Act, would require public school districts to post a short notice advising students and employees of their constitutional rights to religious expression and the existing state statute that protects religious viewpoint.

"The key word in that definition is awareness," Black said during his presentation, describing the measure as an informational notice rather than a change in substantive rights. He said the bill incorporates existing language from Missouri statute Section 160.2500 and cites recent U.S. Supreme Court precedent, including Kennedy v. Bremerton.

Why it matters: the bill aims to make students and staff aware of rights already recognized in law, Black and supporters said. Supporters argued that misunderstanding about the scope of permissible religious expression can chill students and staff from exercising their First Amendment rights; opponents and some committee members pressed sponsors on establishment‑clause concerns and on whether the notice should also advise students of their right to refrain from religious activity.

Committee discussion and testimony - Legal context: Black told the committee the bill is intended to be consistent with Section 160.2500 ("Discrimination based on religious viewpoint or expression prohibited; prayer and religious activities in school permitted"). He cited the Supreme Court27s decision in Kennedy v. Bremerton, which addressed the rights of a public school coach to engage in religious expression. - Questions and concerns: members asked whether the bill might be read as encouraging students to participate in religious activities and whether it should explicitly inform students they also have the right to refrain. Representative Jacobs and others asked about overlap with existing "equal access" laws and with school practices that provide rooms or times for private prayer. - Supporters: a witness identified as speaking "on behalf of Missouri and Ye" (transcript) urged teaching about religion in public schools as part of a well‑rounded education, asking rhetorically, "Is it constitutional to teach about religion in public school? Yes." David Pierce (as recorded) supported the bill and recommended training materials; another witness, Deanna Rhodes Widmer, a retired teacher, also spoke in favor.

What the bill would require - A brief notice posted in the same location as other legal notices on a district27s website and school facilities advising students and staff of their rights to express or refrain from expressing religious views, to pray or read religious texts during free time when it does not interrupt the school27s educational mission, and related protections drawn from state statute. - The bill, as presented, incorporates but does not expand the referenced statute and does not create a private right of action beyond existing law; committee members asked for clarifying language to address the right to refrain and specific posting locations.

Next steps Committee members asked the sponsor to work with colleagues on specific language and to consider clarifying the notice so it cannot be read as an endorsement of religious activity by the district. No committee vote on HB 1262 was recorded at the hearing.

Ending note: Supporters framed the measure as an awareness and training tool consistent with existing Missouri law; committee members signaled they would refine language to address establishment concerns and the right to refrain.