Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Network Adequacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill directing insurance regulator to set network standards for facility‑based specialists
Summary
The Senate Commerce Committee released S.3416 after testimony from physician groups and health plans over whether regulators should require in‑network coverage for specialties such as anesthesiology, radiology, pathology and emergency medicine at in‑network facilities.
The Senate Commerce Committee voted to release S.3416 on March 24, 2025, a bill that would direct the state insurance department to adopt regulations establishing network adequacy standards for certain facility‑based specialists.
Physician groups and specialty societies urged the change, saying the implementation of the federal No Surprises Act has encouraged some carriers to force longstanding in‑network physician groups out of contract or to reduce rates, destabilizing access to care. “Rather than enhance the healthcare marketplace, [the federal law] actually creates economically destabilizing conditions that not only threaten access to care, but impose inordinate financial hardships to already strained physician practices,” said Dr. Michael Ieta, a practicing anesthesiologist who testified in favor.
The New Jersey Association of Health Plans opposed the bill, arguing the state already has robust network adequacy rules and that the proposal could raise costs and complicate rate negotiations. Ward Sanders, representing health plans, said the proposal could affect both commercial and Medicaid markets and might increase costs in a period of scrutiny over carrier rates and federal Medicaid funding.
Committee members debated whether patients presenting at in‑network hospitals were already protected from balance billing and whether the bill would primarily address carriers’ contracting practices rather than a gap in immediate patient access. Supporters said insurance‑network negotiations after the No Surprises Act have led to some provider groups leaving networks because of low arbitration or reimbursement outcomes; they argued S.3416 would restore an incentive for carriers to keep facility‑based specialists in network.
Roll call on the motion to release S.3416 recorded affirmative votes from Senators Bramnick, Singer, Johnson, Vice Chair Kryon and Chairman Lagana. The motion passed and the bill was released from committee.
Sponsors and physician witnesses said the measure is intended to give regulators tools to review network adequacy for anesthesiologists, radiologists, pathologists and emergency physicians and to preserve access in in‑network facilities. Health plan representatives requested more study of cost and Medicaid impacts before regulatory action.
