Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment Wetlands topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Swansea planning board explores conditional‑use permits for wetlands district, seeks conservation commission input
Summary
Planning board members discussed drafting conditional‑use permit standards for the town’s Wetlands District, seeking conservation commission review, mapping overlays, and criteria to limit wetland impacts while providing relief for property owners who need access across wetlands.
The Town of Swansea Planning Board spent a substantial portion of its March 27 meeting discussing whether to adopt conditional‑use permits for the Wetlands District to provide a predictable path for relief in cases such as access drives while protecting wetland functions.
Board members said conditional permits would allow the planning board to attach site‑specific conditions and draw on criteria similar to special exceptions but tailored to wetlands. "If we set up conditional use permits, then we can use some of those criteria ... and we can also add on criteria as to what that special thing is gonna be," a planning board member said. Members discussed keeping existing special‑exception language in place while testing conditional permits specifically for wetlands.
Members stressed that state oversight remains in place: "If we gave them a conditional permit, they'd still have to get a permit, dredging fill permit from the state of New Hampshire," a staff member said, noting the state review would run independently. The board discussed technical safeguards — for example limiting fill, requiring mitigation, and designing crossings that preserve water flow — and flagged a roughly 75‑foot buffer that had been discussed in recent legislative changes.
The board directed staff to assemble available maps showing town parcels with overlay layers for identified wetlands and FEMA floodplain maps so members can examine site‑level examples. "I can do that for right now," a planning staff member said when asked about producing a map with tax parcels and wetland layers. Members also recommended a joint meeting with the conservation commission to develop criteria and a review process so the commission could provide a layer of review before the planning board issues a conditional permit.
Board members noted that conditional permits would not replace required state permits and that any local criteria should be coordinated with state standards. They asked staff to draft proposed ordinance language, identify examples of potential conditions (drainage, mitigation, limited fill), and schedule a joint session with the conservation commission to refine criteria before returning to the full board.
