Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Paid Sick Leave topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Nebraska Legislature debates cleanup to voter-approved paid sick-leave law; committee amendment split for separate votes

2810786 · March 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers debated LB 415 — a cleanup bill for the Nebraska Healthy Families and Workplaces Act — and split a committee package to vote separately on a contentious amendment (AM 7 70) that would exempt small employers, seasonal agricultural workers and minors from parts of the voter-approved law.

Lincoln — The Nebraska Legislature on Wednesday resumed debate over LB 415, a bill described by its sponsor as a cleanup measure to implement the Nebraska Healthy Families and Workplaces Act (initiative 4-36), and the body voted to divide a large committee amendment so lawmakers could take separate up-or-down votes on a contentious portion.

Senator Tom Ballard (Senator Ballard) said LB 4 15 "is a cleanup bill," calling it the product of a working group of business representatives, the Department of Labor and employment-law experts that clarifies accrual, payout and certain definitions in the paid-sick-leave initiative that voters approved last year.

The central dispute on the floor was whether the Legislature should use LB 415 to make clarifying changes or to insert policy rollbacks. The Business and Labor Committee’s package (AM 5 45) bundled LB 415 with several separate bills, including LB 698 from Senator Paul Stroman (Senator Stroman). At the request of senators the committee amendment was divided: AM 7 70 was identified as the standalone portion containing LB 698, and AM 7 71 was the remainder of the committee package. Clerk’s floor staff explained to senators that AM 7 70 would be taken up first.

Why it matters

The dispute pits senators who argue the Legislature should preserve the text and enforcement tools voters approved against colleagues who say the statutory language needs exceptions and guardrails for small employers and seasonal work. Opponents of the carve-outs say the changes would effectively roll back material protections voters overwhelmingly supported last November.

What the amendment would do

Senator Stroman, who introduced LB 698 from the floor, described his measure as "an effort to shield Nebraska's smallest businesses and their employees from the detrimental effect of this act," and said the bill would exempt temporary or seasonal agricultural workers, employees younger than 16 and employers with 10 or fewer employees from portions of the initiative. He told the body the Legislature should "iron out details and make these laws make sense for everyone."

Proponents of keeping the initiative’s text intact emphasized the scale of voter support and enforcement. Senator Megan Hunt (Senator Hunt) warned that proposal AM 07:22 (a different amendment discussed earlier in debate) "guts key parts of the paid sick leave law," saying it would exempt thousands of workers and "water down enforcement." Senator Hunt also cited public-health concerns if groups such as seasonal agricultural workers or teenagers were excluded.

Senator John Kavanaugh (Senator John Kavanaugh) urged the division of the committee amendment so senators could vote separately on the provisions they opposed, explaining that if AM 7 70 "does not get 25 votes, it will not be included in the package," and members who disliked that portion could still support the rest of the cleanup package.

Votes and formal actions

- Clerk read LB 4 15 for the first time on the floor as a bill "relating to Nebraska Healthy Families and Workplaces Act amendments." The clerk noted the bill had been placed on general file with committee amendments.

- A motion to reconsider an earlier vote on Senator McKinney's motion to indefinitely postpone was brought forward (reconsideration motion credited to Senator Dungan). The motion to reconsider failed on the floor; the clerk recorded 12 ayes and 28 nays, and the presiding officer announced "The reconsider motion is not successful." (Formal roll-call details were recorded by the clerk.)

- Senator John Kavanaugh successfully requested a division of the committee amendment. The clerk explained the split: AM 7 70 (containing LB 698) and AM 7 71 (the remainder of the committee amendment). The chair announced AM 7 70 would be taken up first.

- Senator McKinney moved to bracket the bill until June 9, 2025 (MO 111). The transcript records the motion being made and discussed on the floor; no final tally or disposition of that bracket motion appears in the provided transcript excerpts.

Discussion highlights

Supporters of amendments to narrow coverage said they were protecting very small, family-run employers and addressing implementation questions not settled by the initiative’s text. Senator Hallstrom and others pointed to cost and operational challenges for employers with single-digit staffing levels if they must cover paid sick time and pay for replacement labor.

Opponents said the public voted decisively for the initiative and that the Legislature should not remove enforcement tools or carve out groups who face higher health and economic risk. Senator Dungan, among others, described LB 415 in its original form as a plausible cleanup that could be supported, while arguing certain inserted amendments would "walk back the will of the people." Senator Juárez and other senators cited statewide margins: the initiative passed with nearly three in four voters statewide, with no legislative district showing less than 63% support, according to remarks on the floor.

What remains

With the committee amendment divided, senators will vote on AM 7 70 (the portion containing LB 698) separately from AM 7 71 (the rest of the committee package). If AM 7 70 fails to reach the threshold specified by chamber rules for inclusion, it will be dropped from the larger package and members could then vote on the remaining provisions. The transcript in the provided excerpt ends after extended floor debate and procedural motions; subsequent floor votes on the divided amendments were not included in the material supplied.

Ending

Senators on both sides framed their positions around respect for voters and the need for workable implementation. The floor is expected to take up the divided amendments in order; AM 7 70, the more contentious carve-out measure, will be decided first.