Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects Financing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court hears financing options for annex renovation, approves design-team amendment under previously authorized cap
Summary
County consultants outlined financing options for an estimated $11.5 million annex project (tax notes, certificates of obligation, and bonds) and said tax notes could be the fastest route; commissioners approved Annex Design Team ASR #2 for $18,580, below a previously authorized $35,000 cap.
Gonzales County received a briefing from county project manager John Duke and advisors from bond counsel Bickerstaff and financial advisor RBC Capital Markets on financing options for an estimated $11.5 million annex renovation project. The court then approved a design-team amendment for the annex.
Gregory Miller of Bickerstaff described the bond-counsel role, saying the firm evaluates legal authority, prepares documents, and submits the bond transcript to the Texas Attorney General for review. "We help you evaluate the project, fit it within existing state and federal law, get it to the attorney general's office for their blessing, and then close the transaction," he said.
Chris Allen of RBC Capital Markets outlined amortization and tax-rate examples for different debt structures and timeframes, noting options include short tax notes (generally seven years) and longer certificates of obligation or voter-approved bonds. Allen said the county's team prepared conservative scenarios that assumed no growth in taxable value and showed how amortization length affects annual debt service and a hypothetical tax-rate impact. He said a tax note can often be issued faster and could avoid an election for projects considered "bread and butter" infrastructure.
Duke told the court the project team was still awaiting final hazardous-materials lab results for the annex roof cores and expected construction documents around Feb. 7. Staff said they would not issue RFQs or bid invitations before returning to the court at the February 10 meeting with additional direction.
On the design side, commissioners had previously authorized up to $35,000 for a design-team amendment; the actual ASR #2 invoice arrived lower than that. The court approved Annex Design Team ASR #2 for $18,580 by motion and voice vote. The ASR covers design work that includes adding fire sprinklers and related engineering services, which staff said is already factored into the project's $11.5 million cost estimate and could reduce construction time and insurance costs.
Consultants told the court they would return Feb. 10 with additional financing scenarios and recommendations that integrate annex work with the courthouse renovation and potential grant funding.
