Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: March 27 Berkeley County Commission meeting
Summary
Summary of formal motions and voice votes recorded during the March 27 meeting, including approval of the agenda, consent agenda (including a FY2026 community corrections grant application), appointment to the Farmland Protection Board, laptop purchase, and MOU authorization.
The Berkeley County Commission recorded several formal motions and voice votes during the March 27 meeting. The items below reflect motions moved, seconded and approved by voice vote as recorded in the meeting transcript.
Votes at a glance
- Approve agenda for March 27, 2025 — Motion moved and seconded; passed by voice vote. (Recorded as “Ayes have it.”)
- Approve consent agenda (includes request to apply for FY2026 West Virginia community corrections/Day Report Center grant) — Motion moved and seconded; passed by voice vote. Read-ahead described a 12-month grant with a total project request listed as $599,096; the read-ahead also stated a required match and listed $469,212 (the transcript read both figures; the match figure does not equal 30% of the request and should be verified with the grant application documents). The grant described items the DRC would fund, including salaries for director and staff, drivers, drug screens, lab testing fees and offender monitoring.
- Appointment: Louis Talbot to Farmland Protection Board representing the Farm Bureau — Motion moved and seconded; passed by voice vote.
- Purchase of 35 mobile data computers from Unistar Sparco Computers in the amount of $35,945 — Motion moved and seconded; passed by voice vote.
- Approve MOU with Jefferson County for day-report center services and authorize president to sign — Motion moved and seconded; passed by voice vote.
Notes: Votes were recorded by voice with “Aye” responses; the transcript does not provide roll-call tallies or recorded no/abstain votes for these motions. Where specific dollar figures or match percentages were read from the packet (see consent/grant item), the transcript contained a mismatch between the stated total and the stated match amount; staff should supply the grant application document for verification.
Ending: The commission recessed after completing votes and conducting an executive session on pending litigation; no public action resulted from the executive session.
