Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Senior Privilege Option topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Student representatives describe Senior Privilege Option; board members ask about GPA change and program impacts

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Students from Brookfield East and Brookfield Central presented results from a 36-member senior council survey describing the Senior Privilege Option (SPO), reporting that most respondents said SPO improved grades, attendance and behavior; board members asked about the program’s GPA requirement history.

Student representatives from Brookfield East and Brookfield Central described the Senior Privilege Option (SPO), answering board members’ questions and summarizing a survey of 36 senior student‑council members about the program’s effects.

Jake, a student representative, summarized SPO as “an opportunity for seniors to leave campus” during a block typically scheduled as a study hall and said the district’s eligibility criteria this year include completing 12 terms of study, meeting a GPA threshold and remaining in good standing on attendance and behavior. Jake told the board the GPA requirement this year is “a 3.0 on a 4.0 scale” and said the threshold has changed over time: “When it first came out, it was a 3.5. It then moved to 3.2 and now it’s a 3.0,” he said when Board President Scott Wheeler asked about the history.

On program effects, Jake reported survey results from 36 respondents: “92 percent of our respondents cited an improved academic performance,” he said, explicitly tying the improvement to seniors’ use of the extra time for homework and studying. He added that 86 percent of respondents said SPO helped behavior and that 92 percent reported it incentivized attendance because meeting attendance and behavior standards are necessary to keep the privilege.

Students suggested minor adjustments focusing on logistics and partnerships: better coordination of SPO with lunch schedules so students can eat and then leave, and establishing partnerships with local businesses or gyms to offer perks, internships or discounts to eligible seniors. Evan, a representative for Brookfield Central, added that counselors are already working with students to customize schedules and that eligibility can be earned or lost across terms depending on students’ grades and attendance.

Board members asked clarifying questions. Scott Wheeler asked whether the GPA requirement had changed and whether that resulted from student conversations with building leadership; Jake said he believed the change reflected efforts to increase accessibility and extend the reward “to more seniors.” Sam Hughes and other members praised the student presentation and asked counselors to continue working with students on scheduling challenges.

No formal board action was taken on SPO at the meeting; the presentation was informational. Board members thanked the student representatives and invited continued discussion with counselors about scheduling and partnerships.

Proper names [{"name":"Brookfield East High School","type":"school"},{"name":"Brookfield Central High School","type":"school"},{"name":"Elmbrook School District","type":"agency"}]

Speakers relevant to this topic - Jake, Student Representative, Brookfield East (presenter) - Evan, Student Representative, Brookfield Central (presenter) - Scott Wheeler, Board member (question about GPA history) - Sam Hughes, Board member (questions/comments)

Clarifying details - Number of student responses cited: 36 senior-level student-council members. - Eligibility criteria cited by students: complete 12 terms of study; meet GPA threshold (this year 3.0 on 4.0 scale); meet attendance and behavior standards (exact attendance threshold not specified). - Student-reported survey results: 92% reported improved academic performance; 86% reported improved behavior; 92% reported improved attendance (figures cited by student presenters and based on 36 responses). - History of GPA threshold: presenters said it had previously been 3.5, then 3.2, and is currently 3.0 (students’ understanding; board requested confirmation from building leadership).

Discussion vs. decision - Discussion only: student report of survey findings, suggestions for schedule coordination and local partnerships. - Direction: board members asked administration/counselors to continue working with students on schedule customization and to consider logistical changes (e.g., aligning SPO and lunch). - Formal action: none (informational presentation).