Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boundary Subcommittee Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates 'retired or former' language for boundary subcommittee appointments
Summary
Members discussed whether boundary subcommittee appointees should be 'former' or 'retired' superintendents and related roles to avoid perceived conflict while ensuring a sufficient pool of candidates.
Committee members briefly debated language specifying who may serve on a boundary-district subcommittee, focusing on whether appointees should be "former" or "retired" superintendents, business managers and school board members.
One committee member said she favored limiting service to former officeholders to avoid appearances of partiality, while others warned that restricting eligibility to former officials could leave too small a pool of willing applicants. "I am a little concerned about a pool of willing applicants," one member said during the discussion.
Members proposed compromise language such as "retired or former," and discussed whether a person who has announced retirement but remains in position should qualify. At least one member noted the current draft already uses "retired or former." By the end of the exchange members agreed to leave the draft language unchanged for the time being and revisit it if recruitment proved difficult.
No formal action was taken at the March 27 meeting.
