Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Malibu council debates scope of “like‑for‑like” rebuilds under governor’s order
Summary
Council members, staff and residents spent hours discussing how to interpret the governor’s ‘like‑for‑like plus 10%’ rule for fire‑damaged homes, debating who decides what counts as the same location and which safety upgrades should be exempt from size limits.
Malibu City Council members and staff spent much of a special March 19 meeting hashing out how to interpret the governor’s disaster rebuild policy that lets homeowners replace damaged homes “in substantially the same location” with an allowance of up to 10% additional size.
The council and planning staff discussed how to define “substantially the same location,” whether changes in orientation or roof type count as a new build and how to treat nonconforming or previously unpermitted structures. Council members emphasized speeding reconstruction for homeowners who want to restore what they had before the Palisades and other fires, while also preserving neighborhood scale and safety.
The debate centered on three practical questions: how to measure the 10% allowance (height, footprint or aggregate), who interprets the standard in unclear cases, and which changes should be treated as necessary safety upgrades rather than discretionary design changes. Planning Director Joe and City Manager David described current practice and staff plans: the city has typically compared an…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

