Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commercial Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Creekside Commons expansion but split on parking; small wetland impact, mitigation plan debated
Summary
Planning commissioners approved a modification to the Creekside Commons preliminary site plan that increases nonresidential entitlements and reduces existing parking, 3‑2. Staff required a parking study at final site plan; applicant proposed off‑site mitigation credits to address a small wetland impact.
The Planning Commission voted 3‑2 to approve a modification to the Creekside Commons preliminary site plan that increases maximum nonresidential square footage from 315,000 to 362,357 and removes a North Central overlay requirement. Commissioners Prosser and Eslinger supported the request; Commissioners Bauer and Gay voted no, citing parking and circulation concerns.
Benderson Development’s representative said Creekside Commons is largely built out and the request would allow additional retail and service uses that local demand has shown. The company proposed a modest parking reduction of about 6.5% (below the county’s typical 10% reduction allowance) and agreed to a condition requiring an applicant‑prepared parking study at final site plan.
Environmental testimony from the applicant’s engineer and environmental director noted a proposed 0.55‑acre wetland impact in a corner of the site and additional impacts to a previously created on‑site mitigation area. The consultant said the mitigation area has been difficult to sustain and noted recent guidance from permitting agencies favoring purchase of off‑site mitigation bank credits rather than small on‑site mitigation pockets. The applicant proposed buying mitigation credits off‑site rather than relying on small on‑site mitigation cells.
Staff supported the request conditioned on a parking study and other standard stipulations. Residents who live next to the center raised parking and construction‑related effects during public comment; one resident said he often drives around the lot looking for spaces. Commissioner Prosser said she frequently visits the center and supported the parking‑study condition. Commissioners Bauer and Gay opposed the modification because of remaining parking safety concerns.
The commission approved the amendment 3‑2; staff will require a parking study and standard environmental permitting and mitigation through the state agencies and county review at final site plan.
