Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meeting roundup: commission approves meeting recap, disbands legislative subcommittee, vests RFP decisions to steering committee
Summary
At the Hillsborough County Commission on Human Trafficking meeting commissioners approved the January meeting recap, disbanded the legislative and judicial subcommittee and directed remaining RFP and procurement decisions to the steering committee; several other items were discussed and referred to the steering committee.
Get email alerts on the Meeting Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its March meeting the Hillsborough County Commission on Human Trafficking took several procedural and governance votes and issued direction to staff and the steering committee.
Key votes and outcomes
- Approval of meeting recap: The commission approved the January 23, 2025 meeting recap on a voice vote.
- Disband legislative and judicial subcommittee: Commissioners voted to disband the legislative and judicial subcommittee and asked staff to continue providing legislative updates at full meetings.
- Vest RFP/procurement authority in steering committee: The commission voted to authorize the steering committee to advance procurement steps, including issuance and scoring of RFPs for remaining commission funds, to meet procurement timelines. Staff noted a typical RFP procurement timeline can take 90 days and emphasized the need for timely decisions.
Other items discussed
- Public art (mural) installation: Staff reported that the Florida Department of Transportation reviewed and moved the installation locations; the artwork will remain unchanged but panels will be installed at alternate FDOT‑approved locations near the transit area. Staff said FDOT is pricing options and the Tampa Foundation is managing the project schedule.
- Public comment and steering committee scheduling: Several items, including public comments, were deferred to the April steering committee meeting to allow more detailed review and procurement planning.
No roll‑call tallies were recorded in the public audio for these procedural votes; outcomes were recorded as voice votes in the meeting minutes.

