Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Space Land Swap topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents oppose converting Distal open space for a proposed composting facility
Summary
Speakers told council they oppose using open-space land for a proposed composting or recycling transfer operation, arguing open-space purchases are intended to remain protected; speakers warned of increased travel, illegal dumping and property-value impacts and urged the council to preserve open-space permanence.
Two residents used public comment to object to a proposal that would relocate city recycling and tree-and-limb operations to the Distal open-space property and to any swap of protected open space for other uses.
Gary Hodges told council that open space purchased with open-space tax funds is intended to be “set aside forever,” and said that converting Distal for composting or recycling transfer would violate community expectations about open space. Hodges argued that moving operations away from the Martin Street site to Distal would increase travel distances for residents dropping off large items and could encourage illegal dumping; he said, “If we actually care about what is promised by community recycling, that is saving resources, moving the city's recycling and the tree and limb division, facility to Distal is a really bad idea.”
David Rex, who identified himself as a Weld County resident, said he and others moved to avoid such industrial uses and warned that a swap would impose costs on nearby property owners while delivering little local benefit. Both speakers urged council to preserve Distal as protected open space.
What the city said: Staff indicated a proposal to relocate operations to Distal had been discussed previously and that a relocation to the Martin Street site was reportedly off the table; speakers urged the council to treat open space purchases as permanent and to avoid trades. Council did not take action during the study session; public comments will be part of the public record.
Context: Gary Hodges referenced prior state legislation that changed rules on unrelated adults living together; he framed that change as an example of how well-intentioned state actions can have unintended local consequences. No ordinance or swap was voted on at the study session.
