Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Collection Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears challenges to children’s and YA titles; directors to follow collection-development procedures
Summary
Board members discussed multiple public challenges to library materials, citing titles that some speakers called explicit or inappropriate for children. Directors are using the system's collection-development policy and the board will receive appeals and reports as required.
Multiple public challenges to library materials — including several children’s and young-adult titles — were brought to the Sumner County Library Board’s attention on March 26. Library directors have pulled flagged items and are following the system’s collection-development and reconsideration process.
Joanna Daniels, chair of the Sumner County Library Board, read examples of titles that had been challenged and said directors were reviewing those items under the board’s collection-development policy. Titles cited in the meeting transcript included Call Me Max; Love, Violet; Fred Gets Dressed; Tango Makes 3; and at least one young-adult title addressing sexual orientation.
Directors and board members stressed that the library’s written challenge/reconsideration procedure gives directors the first responsibility to review contested materials; appeals can come to the full board. Joanna said the board’s legal counsel told members the ultimate responsibility for collection decisions rests with the board when appeals are filed, and that a paper trail (the standard challenge form) should be used so the board can review and, if necessary, decide on appeals.
Several board members and directors said the policy is intended to treat all challenges consistently and to ensure the public can use the formal process. The board asked Anita and the directors to ensure forms are available at branches and to report any appeals or policy problems to the board at upcoming meetings.
Why it matters: Challenges to library materials touch on First Amendment and local policy questions, and they provoke strong public interest. The board said it wants a clear, consistent process that directors and patrons can follow.
What happens next: Directors will continue to review challenged items using the library’s collection-development and reconsideration procedures. If an appeal is submitted after a director’s decision, the matter will be scheduled for board review under the adopted process.
Ending: The board emphasized that directors should record challenges on the official form and that the board will only act on appeals or when the formal process is invoked.
