Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Staff discuss differences between H.146 and S.100 on small CAFO designation and implementation
Summary
At a Natural Resources & Energy meeting, staff compared two bills—H.146 and S.100—on how regulators would treat small concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), how designation decisions would be made, and the timing and mechanics for transferring enforcement to ANR.
At a Natural Resources & Energy meeting, staff compared two bills—H.146 and S.100—on how regulators would treat small concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), how designation decisions would be made, and the timing and mechanics for transferring enforcement to ANR. Both bills include a default effective date of July 2025, staff said.
The comparison focused on whether a small CAFO can be designated as a significant contributor to pollution without an on-site inspection and how much discretion the secretary would have. Speaker 3, Staff member, summarized the H.146 language in the side-by-side: "A and R shall not find that a small AIPO is a significant contributor of pollutants to waters of the state unless the secretary has conducted an on-site…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
