Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cdbg Housing Grants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates CDBG allocations, agrees to keep $30,000 minimum award this round and tables major housing reallocation
Summary
Salt Lake City councilors reviewed proposed FY 2025-26 CDBG and federal grant allocations, kept the current minimum subrecipient award at $30,000 for this round and signaled support for raising it to $50,000 in future cycles while tabling several housing reallocation decisions pending applicant follow-up.
Salt Lake City council members and housing staff reviewed proposed funding allocations for FY 2025-26 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and other federal grants, heard staff clarifications about program eligibility and timeliness rules, and took several procedural decisions including a unanimous straw poll to keep the current minimum subrecipient award at $30,000 for this funding round while supporting a future increase to $50,000.
The council's housing and stability staff briefed members on options that would take effect in the next application cycle. "If you guys were comfortable with, we can implement this and start doing it for their next applications in October," said Tony Milner, director of Housing and Stability, describing the proposed $50,000 minimum for subrecipient awards.
Why it matters: the minimum award level affects how many small nonprofit subrecipients can apply for and administer federal funds. Staff said raising the minimum eases administrative burdens for smaller agencies but could reduce the number of total awards if federal allocations shrink. The council's unanimous outcome left the current threshold at $30,000 for the immediate round and signaled support for $50,000 in future cycles, with a caveat to preserve flexibility if the city's HUD award declines.
Key discussion points and staff clarifications
- Eligibility and local use: staff confirmed that all CDBG-funded home repair and housing programs must serve Salt Lake City residents and properties within city limits. "For all of the CDBG dollars, they have to be Salt Lake City residents and the homes have to be within Salt Lake City boundaries," a staff member said.
- Fix the Bricks and FEMA: staff explained the city's Fix the Bricks seismic retrofit program and how funding streams (CDBG vs FEMA) differ; FEMA-funded fixes can be citywide without AMI limits while CDBG-funded home repairs generally require household income at or below 80% area median income.
- Contingencies and timeliness: housing stability recommended contingencies tied to HUD award amounts so staff would not need to return to council for technical adjustments if final federal awards differ from estimates; the council indicated no objection to using the administration's proposed contingencies.
Council actions, straw polls and procedural outcomes
- Minimum award: straw poll to remain at $30,000 for the current round and move to $50,000 in future rounds (unanimous).
- Contingencies: councilors expressed no objection to adopting the contingencies proposed by Housing Stability to handle fluctuations in HUD award amounts.
- Public comment period: staff noted the formal public comment period on these allocations was closing that day and that comments would be provided to the council.
- Specific reallocations and tabled items: council members proposed several reallocations between NIS (neighborhood improvements), NeighborWorks Salt Lake, Habitat for Humanity, and city-run Fix the Bricks programs. After extended discussion about capacity, minimum funding thresholds and program overlap, councilors agreed to table the detailed housing reallocation conversation pending follow-up information (including confirmation of minimums from applicants such as Habitat and NeighborWorks and a request for a breakdown of how many homes each applicant would serve at various funding levels).
- Public services and other adjustments: the council approved moving $50,000 from one neighborhood-improvement line item to the Utah Film Center to support a capital project and approved the mayor/CDCIP spreadsheet recommendations generally (a staff motion to advance the mayor's recommended allocations was recorded as unanimous).
What was not decided: councilors did not adopt final changes to the full CDBG housing allocations during the work session. Several funding-shift proposals were discussed at length but put on hold so staff can provide additional responsiveness on applicant readiness, minimum operational asks and neighborhood prioritization.
Ending: Council members directed staff to follow up with applicants about minimum funding levels and project readiness, provided guidance on possible reallocations, and scheduled further discussion at a subsequent meeting. The final grant awards and contracts will proceed after council decisions in the coming weeks and once HUD issues final award amounts.
