Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission conditions slope- and habitat-sensitive Privet Road rebuild, continues separate adjacent item
Summary
The Commission approved the permit package for an adjacent Privet Road lot with site-plan and minor-modification approvals and ERB-driven landscape conditions; a nearby, related application was continued to March 17 for further neighbor coordination.
The Planning Commission on Feb. 18 approved a Coastal Development Permit and associated discretionary requests for a Privet Road property (staff identified the application with permit numbers beginning with 20/21; see staff report for full case IDs). The project involves a two-story single-family reconstruction with associated grading, retaining walls and a pool; staff identified discretionary requests for ESHA-related encroachment, a site-plan review for steep slopes and a minor modification for yard setbacks.
Planner Rick Caswell summarized the constraints: the lot rests between steep slopes and a blue-line stream, has existing retaining walls and remnants of a prior residence, and includes ESHA and oak-walnut woodland areas. The application proposes a flat-roof building under the maximum 24-foot flat-roof height permitted with site-plan review, a driveway hammerhead to improve Fire Department access, and restoration planting in response to tree impacts.
Neighbors reiterated concerns about Privet Road access, drainage into coastal streams, and the narrow private easement. "My concern is, every single neighbor on our canyon has a security gate," said neighbor Alina Sikovetsky. Commission and applicant discussion clarified that no gate was proposed for the approved project and that any future gate would require separate review and Knox-box access for emergency responders.
The Commission approved the application with conditions that incorporate the Environmental Review Board (ERB) recommendations to protect walnut and oak saplings, remove invasive species, and restore woodland where feasible. Commissioners also required site-specific fire-hardening measures similar to those adopted for the neighboring lot, and noted required follow-up items such as final drainage and arborist reports before the city will issue building permits.
Separately, the Commission granted a continuance by date certain to March 17 for another, adjacent agenda item (item 4A) at the applicant's request so the applicant and a neighboring property owner could continue settlement discussions. The continuance was seconded and carried by roll call.
Why it matters: The approvals show how the Commission is balancing rebuild desire with ESHA protections and neighbor access/roadway concerns; staff will return final resolutions and must verify mitigation and technical studies before permits are issued.
