Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charitable Gaming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee tacks legislative study onto tap‑room bill to examine charities' gaming and bar ownership
Summary
Lawmakers amended Senate Bill 23‑34 to add a Legislative Management study of charitable gaming organizations' ownership of bars and relationships with manufacturers; the amended bill passed the committee.
Get email alerts on the Charitable Gaming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A committee added a study provision to a bill concerning tap rooms and charitable gaming and approved the bill as amended.
During consideration of Senate Bill 23‑34 (concerning tap rooms), Representative Clamine offered an amendment that removed a proposed moratorium and instead asked Legislative Management to study charitable gaming organizations that own bars, the relationship between manufacturers/distributors and licensed charitable organizations, and incentives manufacturers may provide to charities. The amendment was described as exploratory: lawmakers cited concerns about money flowing out of state to manufacturers, incentives or payments from manufacturers to charities for machine placements, and a trend of charities purchasing multiple bars.
Representative Clamine moved the amendment, Representative Bosley seconded, and committee discussion included a suggestion that Legislative Management might deprioritize the study but supporters said interim review would provide useful information. Representative Hager voiced a preference for a full public hearing rather than an interim study but the amendment passed on a 9–1–3 vote. The committee then voted to recommend a do‑pass as amended; the full bill passed the committee 10–0–3 as amended. Representative Clamine agreed to carry the bill.
Why it matters: The amendment creates a formal review mechanism into the financial relationships and operations of charitable gaming organizations and their interaction with manufacturers and distributors; lawmakers said the study would clarify whether further statutory action is needed.
Ending: The committee approved the study amendment and advanced the bill; members asked staff to coordinate with Legislative Management and to collect testimony for the interim review.
