Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Laza Case topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter alleges procedural problems in long-running case involving local business owner
Summary
A public commenter, Tanya Willis, told the council she and business owner Jerry Laza endured nine years of litigation and alleged improper actions by the city's legal representatives and others; the remarks were received during the public comment period and no formal action was taken.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Laza Case topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the meeting’s public comment period, Tanya Willis addressed the council about a long-running civil case involving business owner Jerry Laza and alleged misconduct by the city and private counsel in prior proceedings. Willis said the case "concluded in favor of the city" and described a multiyear legal and financial hardship for the family, including bankruptcy and loss of property.
Willis alleged at the microphone that counsel for the opposing party had used civil discovery to seek information linked to a criminal investigation and that efforts to obtain city cooperation in post-trial proceedings were unsuccessful. She said she and Laza attempted to file an appeal and to ask the court to stay judgment but were told a cash bond would be required; she said the city did not waive that bond. Willis characterized actions by the opposing attorney as intended to "ruin" Laza and accused the city of failing to step in despite being able to do so.
Willis also urged council members to use influence with the Texas Municipal League, stating, "All you had to do now is say Texas Municipal League, stop." The remarks were made during the public comment period; the transcript does not record a council response or any formal referral or action resulting from the comments during the meeting.
The city did not provide any immediate comment in the meeting transcript; Willis’s statements were delivered as citizen remarks and contain allegations about legal proceedings and conduct. The transcript does not include corroborating documents or further council direction on the matter.
