Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sign Permit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Main Street board tables Warren's Barbershop projecting-sign permit; minutes from Jan. 28 approved
Summary
The Main Street Advisory Board on Feb. 25 voted to table a permit application for a projecting sign at Warren's Barbershop pending measurements and any written variance request; the board also approved minutes from its Jan. 28 meeting by voice vote.
Get email alerts on the Sign Permit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the Feb. 25 Main Street Advisory Board meeting the board voted to table action on a sign permit application for Warren's Barbershop at 307 West Oak Street until staff obtains clarification on measurements and whether the applicant will seek a variance.
Mary Anne, Main Street coordinator, told the board the application proposes a projecting sign (two-sided, perpendicular to the façade) and a three-dimensional barber-pole replica that would not be an illuminated, operating pole. She said the application package submitted to staff included a certificate of appropriateness but lacked needed permit details such as the exact projection and sidewalk clearance measurements necessary to confirm compliance with the Main Street projecting-sign specifications (10-foot minimum sidewalk clearance, maximum sign area for a one-story building of 14 square feet, and a sign height up to three feet).
Heather moved that the board ask staff to obtain those clarifications and to determine whether the applicant intends to request a variance for sign height or projection; Jonathan seconded. The motion to table passed on a voice vote; no opposition was recorded. Board members asked staff to request a written variance application if the proposed barber-pole replica or sign dimensions exceed code limits.
Separately, the board approved the minutes from its Jan. 28 meeting. Jonathan moved to approve the minutes and Jean seconded; the board approved by voice vote with no opposition noted.
Nut graf: The board withheld a final decision on the projecting sign because the application packet lacked the measurements needed to confirm compliance with projecting-sign rules; staff will seek the missing dimensions and any written variance request before the board considers approval.
The board directed staff to follow up with the applicant and to return the item to a future agenda once the requested documentation is provided.
