Office of Consumer Services, OCS experts press PSC to require quantified cost–risk analysis before approving RMP’s expanded plan
OCS witnesses and outside experts told the Utah PSC the record lacks a quantified cost-vs-risk (cost-benefit) analysis; they urged the commission to reject the revised 2023 plan or limit recovery now and to require a risk‑informed benefit‑cost analysis for future plans
The full story
Office of Consumer Services witnesses and consultants told the Utah Public Service Commission the record in RMP’s Wildland Fire Protection Plan docket lacks the quantified cost–versus‑risk evidence the commission needs to decide whether to allow recovery of substantially higher wildfire spending.
Sign up to keep reading.
Your free newsletter brings you what your city council, county, and school board discussed and decided.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to finish this story and see the video, transcript and key details.
Continue with GoogleContinue with emailAlready have an account? Log in