Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Watershed Dams topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Soil and Water Conservation asks $150,000 for routine maintenance of watershed dams
Summary
The Soil and Water Conservation Commission told the Senate subcommittee it needs $150,000 in state funds for routine maintenance on watershed dams to preserve regulatory compliance and to preserve eligibility for federal cost-share on future rehabilitations.
The Soil and Water Conservation Commission asked the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on March 18 for $150,000 in state funding to support routine maintenance of watershed dams statewide.
Commission staff told the committee that Georgia has about 200 Category 1 watershed dams (those where failure could cause loss of life), with roughly 60 of those formally permitted. Routine maintenance—mowing, spray control and minor metal repairs—averaged about $2,700 per dam in FY24 and enabled work on 62 dams for about $165,000, the commission said. That maintenance preserves regulatory compliance and helps the state and local partners remain eligible for federal cost-share if heavy rehabilitation is later required.
Why it matters: if dams fall into disrepair, the commission said later rehabilitation costs are much higher and federal partners (for example, USDA/NRCS) will cost-share only when dams are in proper maintenance condition; federal partners have historically cost-shared up to 65% of major rehab costs when state partners meet maintenance obligations.
Other notes: the commission said the funds previously came from bond/capital sources and that moving the maintenance money into an ongoing state line item would better match the work. The commission also promised a report in November describing options, including the potential to breach some unpermitted dams.
Ending: subcommittee members questioned where the dams are located and whether breach analyses had been completed; staff replied many of the Category 1 dams—largely built in the 1950s–1960s for flood control—are in North Georgia and that breach analyses had been completed for a majority as part of a prior EPD study.
