Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Playgrounds Equipment Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee recommends Nittany Woodcraft playground bid for elementary site after comparing three quotes
Summary
The facilities committee reviewed three bids for an elementary playground and recommended the lowest complete bid—Nittany Woodcraft—while asking staff to report back on surfacing materials and environmental concerns.
Get email alerts on the Playgrounds Equipment Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The facilities committee reviewed three vendor quotes for new playground equipment for an elementary school and recommended moving forward with the local bidder, Nittany Woodcraft.
Why it matters: The current playground was partly removed during construction; the district sought replacement equipment that balances cost, durability and safety. Committee members cited liability and long‑term maintenance when weighing options.
What staff presented: Brett, facilities staff, said all three bids include equipment installation but not all include site prep; Nittany Woodcraft (Mill Hall) provided the lowest complete package when a $2,500 site‑prep allowance was included, for a combined total of about $85,652.46 in the packet. The Nittany bid included a one‑year parts/workmanship warranty, a 20‑year structural warranty and a five‑year accessory warranty.
Committee discussion: Board members debated whether to reuse two existing pieces of older equipment (a middle estimate from George Ealy and Associates included reinstalling two salvageable pieces for about $9,112) or to replace all equipment with new structures. Several members said liability and safety favored new equipment. One member raised environmental and health questions about ground surfacing: some vendors proposed engineered wood fiber or natural wood chips while others proposed a colored, recycled rubber mulch or geotextile underlayers. A board member said they would not support a non‑natural ground cover and asked staff to research longevity, potential microplastics and inhalant risks for recycled rubber products. Another member noted wood‑chip surfacing requires frequent replenishment and increases annual maintenance costs.
Outcome and next steps: The committee agreed to proceed with the Nittany Woodcraft recommendation while asking staff to provide additional information on surface materials, longevity and environmental/health tradeoffs; staff confirmed the playground equipment will be paid from the bond approved in the Liberty Curtain construction budget. The committee also discussed sponsorship options (donor naming or logos) as a potential funding offset but had no sponsors to report.
Ending: Staff will confirm final pricing (tax‑exempt status will reduce quoted tax amounts), provide additional material comparisons (rubber mulch vs engineered wood fiber vs wood chips), and return to the committee with that information before final contract execution.

