Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Property Leases topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs bill letting districts lease unused land longer for solar, storage or affordable housing

2790777 · March 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senators approved a bill to let Colorado school districts lease underutilized property for any term of years when used for solar fields, energy storage or affordable housing, after testimony from school finance and community representatives and one opponent worried about long-term taxpayer impacts.

A Senate committee voted to let local school boards authorize long-term leases of district-owned property when the lease is used for community solar, energy storage or "affordable" housing projects, rather than limiting leases to a 10-year maximum.

Supporters said the change gives districts more financial flexibility and allows public–private projects that require longer payback periods. "We were right down to the last minute until we found out that we could only lease the surface of our land for 10 years," said Scott Smith of CASE and CFO of Cherry Creek Schools, describing a community solar garden project whose economics require a longer lease term. "This allows us to meet some of our short term goals without having to compromise our long term asset position."

Concerns from the public: A taxpayer and resident who testified, Natalie Menton, said the bill's title focused on solar but also allows subsidized housing and warned that long leases could shift service costs (fire, human services) onto other taxing jurisdictions if property-tax or service patterns change. "If these are underutilized, not needed properties, they should be put on the market," Menton said. She urged caution about multi-decade or century-long lease commitments that could affect future taxpayers.

What the bill does: The draft explicitly limits the long-term-lease option to three uses—solar fields, energy storage systems, and affordable housing—and requires local boards to adopt a public board policy defining affordable housing and to provide public notice and discussion before restricting land from future educational use. All leases must comply with local zoning and land-use requirements.

Committee action and vote: After testimony and discussion the committee advanced the bill to the Committee of the Whole; the roll-call recorded the motion passing 4–2.

Context and next steps: Proponents said allowing longer leases can enable community-benefit projects on land that otherwise would remain unused, and they emphasized that the change is optional for districts. Opponents warned about long-term taxpayer impacts and urged market sale instead of extended leases. The bill will go to the Committee of the Whole for further consideration.