Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Events Permitting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Organizers win approvals for downtown events; council asks staff for cost estimates and insurance options
Summary
The council approved street closures and an MOU to support downtown events but asked staff to return with estimates of the city’s costs, options for handling event insurance and possible fee structures for recurring festivals.
Council approved multiple street-closure requests and a memorandum of understanding to support downtown events, and asked staff to quantify the city’s direct costs before future approvals or fee-policy changes.
Representatives from event organizations asked the council for routine closure approvals and, in one case, assistance with event insurance. Kurt, representing the Fraternal Order of Eagles, asked the city to consider covering the insurance for the group’s planned Main Street car cruises; he said the Eagles’ estimated incremental insurance cost for six cruise nights would be “about 5 to $6,000” and that operational on‑day costs for closures and barriers would be additional. City staff clarified that the council was only being asked that evening to approve street closures for the Eagles and that any separate request for the city to assume insurance costs would be brought back as a distinct item.
Parks staff (Vanda Meehan) presented the Carrie Nation Days closure request; Parks said the event would be the same as last year with a small stage move and a one-block closure on the 500 block for May 30–31. Connie Hubbard, treasurer of Downtown Belton Main Street Inc., requested closures for Cinco de Mayo and the Fall Festival, said DBMSI will provide insurance certificates, and noted the fall festival will be one day in September.
Council discussion focused on precedent and cost. City staff said it would not be unprecedented for the city to assume liability for a city event, but the Parks Department also noted most of these events have become part of the city’s operating budget over time. Several council members asked staff to return with a dollar estimate for the additional public-safety, public-works and administrative costs the city incurs supporting these events. Councilors also discussed the fairness of a consistent fee structure for event organizers versus council-level discretion for individual approvals; staff said they would provide options and historical cost information.
The council approved the street closures and the MOU by voice vote and instructed staff to provide cost estimates and policy recommendations for future event support and any fee schedule that might be applied.
