Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate panel backs hands‑free driving bill after hours of debate and emotional testimony

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

CS for SB 1318, which would expand Florida’s distracted‑driving law into a bright‑line hands‑free prohibition and make violations a primary offense, was reported favorably after extended debate about enforceability, equity for drivers with older vehicles, and testimony from crash survivors and law‑enforcement representatives.

The Appropriations Committee on Transportation, Tourism and Economic Development on Oct. 12 reported favorably CS for Senate Bill 1318, a measure that would expand the state’s texting‑while‑driving prohibition into a hands‑free driving law by banning use of a wireless communications device in a handheld manner and making violations a primary offense.

Sponsor Senator Grahl told the committee the bill “enhances road safety by discouraging distracted driving and promoting the use of hands free technology” and said it renames the existing ban and expands the prohibition to handheld wireless device use. The measure requires law enforcement to note device types used in work‑zone violations on tickets and to report the information to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles for inclusion in the department’s annual report to the governor and legislative leaders.

Committee members raised repeated concerns about enforcement and equity. Senator Angolia asked whether the bill would criminalize drivers who use older vehicles lacking built‑in hands‑free systems; Grahl replied the bill permits use of hands‑free accessories (for example, mounted or clipped devices) and a speakerphone, but that the device may not touch the driver’s body. Senator Leak and others questioned whether holding a phone on one’s lap would justify a traffic stop under the proposed bright‑line rule. Senators urged adding additional triggers (for example, weaving or inordinately slow speeds) or safeguards so that a single lawful act—holding a phone—would not alone be the sole basis for a stop.

The committee heard extensive public testimony. Christopher Kyle Chapman, a Leon County resident and crash survivor, said the driver who hit him received a $30 ticket; Chapman said, “The driver who hit me and changed my life forever received a $30 ticket. Let that sink in. A $30 ticket.” Representatives of AARP, AAA, the Florida Bicycle Association and the Florida Highway Patrol spoke in support. A Florida Highway Patrol trooper testified that the current law is difficult to enforce and that a bright‑line prohibition would simplify enforcement and improve roadway safety; he also noted operational burdens related to a required traffic‑stop data report.

Supporters emphasized lives lost and family tragedies. Demetrius Branca and Demetra (surname not specified) described local advocacy and county and city resolutions urging a hands‑free law; Demetra noted multiple counties and cities had adopted resolutions asking the Legislature to act. Opponents in the committee were few, and several senators said they supported the bill while urging sponsor Grahl to refine language addressing enforcement, judge and magistrate discretion, and potential disproportionate impacts on lower‑income drivers who may drive older vehicles.

After debate and public testimony, the committee called a roll; the clerk reported: “By your vote, CS for Senate Bill 13 18 is reported favorably.”