Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Strategic Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board hears strategic-planning timeline tied to Portrait of a Graduate; five domains to guide priorities

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff updated the board on a strategic-planning process grounded in the Portrait of a Graduate; the plan outlines five strategic domains, a five-year horizon and a March board consideration for approval.

District staff presented an update on the Green Bay Area Public School District's strategic-planning work on Jan. 13, describing a framework built from the Portrait of a Graduate and a proposed five-year horizon to measure progress toward district priorities.

Why it matters: the strategic plan will set district priorities and metrics that shape resource allocation, personnel decisions and capital planning over the coming years.

What was presented

Assistant superintendent David (full name not specified in transcript) reviewed the five strategic domains developed by domain teams: Academic Excellence, Operational Excellence, Thriving Student Body, Family and Community Engagement (including global inclusivity), and Thriving Workforce. Staff described parallel structure between academic and operational metrics and said each domain will include critical elements and measurement tools.

Timeline and measurements

Staff said baseline measures and measurement tools for the domains would be identified by Jan. 20 and presented to the board on Feb. 10. The administration proposed a five-year monitoring horizon as a benchmark for progress toward the Portrait of a Graduate, with the strategic plan proposed for board adoption at the board meeting on Feb. 24 and an effective date of July 1.

Board members discussed the five-year horizon, noting it extends past the typical board member term and raising questions about governance, annual review processes and how the plan will endure through future boards. Staff described the five-year window as consistent with common practice and a useful mid-range benchmark for measurable goals.

Next steps

Domain teams will refine measures, identify baselines and return to the board on Feb. 10 with draft metrics and the draft strategic plan for discussion in March, with adoption considered at the Feb. 24 board meeting. Staff emphasized the plan will be reviewed annually and tied to operational actions and capital planning.