Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Campus Foundation Support topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Richland County education committee votes to send amended letter to Campus Foundation asking to discuss capital support

2787045 · March 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Richland County Education Committee approved sending a letter to the Campus Foundation requesting a meeting to discuss possible foundation support for capital needs, removing an unverified sentence about past foundation offers to fund a recruiter.

The Richland County Education Committee voted to send an amended letter to the Campus Foundation asking the foundation to meet with county representatives to discuss potential financial support for campus capital needs.

The vote took place after committee members debated language about a prior foundation offer to fund a recruiter. The committee removed the sentence that read, in effect, “we understand in the past the foundation has offered multiple times to fund a recruiter for our campus, but the offer was declined,” because members said they lacked documentation to support that claim.

Committee chair Linda (name per transcript) brought the item to the floor and Barb Boyse moved to send the letter. Sean Murphy Lopez seconded the motion. During discussion, Bob Frank asked whether the letter should reference a foundation offer to match $100,000 and cover $20,000 in insurance; committee members said the letter asks the foundation to “consider” offering up to $100,000 a year for capital projects but does not assert that the foundation has already committed the $20,000 insurance payment.

The letter will include three attachments: documentation related to registration problems that students have experienced, a county resolution from the education committee, and a report assembled by the referendum committee. Committee members agreed the attachments would accompany the letter when it is emailed and that a portion of the material would be sent by direct mail to foundation board members.

The committee voted to remove the unverified recruiter sentence and then voted to send the letter as amended. The chair recorded the outcome as unanimous; the committee stated a quorum of five members was present for the votes.

The committee indicated it will send the letter promptly; members noted the foundation’s board meets next Tuesday, the 13th, and that Roseanne Noor is the foundation’s new office contact.

Less-critical meeting housekeeping followed: the committee set its next full meeting for Monday at 3:00 p.m. to accommodate a UW System visit.