Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff and regional planner discuss scope and timeline for a county comprehensive plan
Summary
The committee heard a presentation from Troy Maggi of the Southwest Regional Planning Commission on statutory requirements, scope options and approaches for updating the county comprehensive plan; members discussed whether responsibility should remain with the Land and Zoning committee or move to Rules and Strategic Planning.
The Rules and Strategic Planning Standing Committee discussed scope, oversight and timing for updating Richland County's comprehensive plan after a presentation by Troy Maggi of the Southwest Regional Planning Commission.
Maggi summarized statutory elements required in a comprehensive plan and said state law requires a plan update every 10 years, though the statute does not strictly define the form or depth of an "update." He said the county's current comprehensive plan dated from February 2007 and that counties vary in how much detail they include; some counties and townships perform a lightweight update while cities and villages facing greater change often pursue deeper, usable documents. "The plan requires an update every 10 years, but it doesn't tell you what an update is," Maggi said.
Maggi described a flexible approach that starts with identifying the county's goals and the value the county expects from a new plan, then scopes the work accordingly. He suggested focusing effort where the county has the greatest need — for example, future land use, housing, workforce and public-health priorities — and noted the county could coordinate municipal plans such as Richland Center's recent plan. He also pointed to funding and staffing sources that sometimes support county planning work, including land-information and GIS funds.
Committee members questioned whether responsibility for the comprehensive plan should remain with the Land and Zoning standing committee (where current responsibility is assigned) or move to Rules and Strategic Planning. Some members argued the planning work is strategic and fits this committee's charge; others noted that the statutory framework and local plan commission requirements could influence the appropriate oversight and urged consultation with Land and Zoning.
There was no formal vote; members asked staff to consult with the Land and Zoning committee and return with recommendations. Maggi said he would work with staff to clarify scope options and potential funding approaches if the county chooses to pursue a plan update.
