Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Road Access Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves second driveway access variance for Farmington parcel

2786688 · March 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Washington County Public Works Committee approved a variance allowing a second access point to a Farmington parcel, granting a second driveway for agricultural use while keeping restrictions intended to protect sightlines and safety.

The Washington County Public Works Committee voted to approve a variance request allowing a second access point to a parcel on County L M in the Town of Farmington.

The action, moved by Supervisor Hartwick and seconded by Supervisor Gratt, responded to a property owner request to add a northern access drive to a parcel that already has a residential southern access. Scott, County Highway Department staff, told the committee the original access was granted years ago with restrictions and staff could not approve a second access administratively because the parcel does not meet the county’s rule limiting multiple exit points to the same parcel.

Scott said staff was supportive of the variance “with restrictions” listed in the committee packet and described the proposed northern access location as offering acceptable sight lines and spacing for agricultural and regular vehicles. He noted an agricultural field across from the proposed access and explained the alternate would force a farmer to drive “around the backside of the house” or risk driving through a ditch in muddy conditions.

Committee members asked whether sight lines and safety were adequate; Scott said the location met spacing requirements and that moving the access further south would begin to eliminate required spacing. After no further questions, the committee voted and the motion carried with all present voting aye.

The committee’s approval sends the variance forward under the conditions described in the staff packet; the packet lists specific restrictions but the committee transcript references them only generally.

The committee also approved last month’s meeting minutes at the start of the session.