Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Short Term Rental Ordinance Fee topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Richland County committee sets short-term rental licensing fee at $25 and signals move from conditional-use to permitted use

2786523 · February 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Natural Resources Committee voted to set a county short-term rental licensing fee at $25 annually and asked staff to include language to move short-term rentals from conditional-use status to a permitted use in the zoning ordinance; the matter will go to Executive & Finance for further action.

The Richland County Natural Resources Committee voted to set a short-term rental licensing fee at $25 per year and directed staff to include language in the forthcoming resolution to change short-term rentals from a conditional use to a permitted use under the county zoning ordinance.

Committee members discussed a range of fee options, noting examples from neighboring jurisdictions (one township license was cited at $500 annually; another locality cited $100). Members said their goal was a modest fee to cover administrative costs, not to create a revenue source. After discussion, a motion to set the county fee at $25 a year was seconded and approved by voice vote; no roll-call vote was recorded during the meeting.

Members asked staff to draft resolution language that would: (1) align the county licensing start date with the state short-term rental license period, (2) allow a transition from conditional-use permits to the new licensing approach, and (3) include a provision to refund applicants if a future county license fee is set lower than fees paid under prior processes. The committee will forward the item and the draft resolution language to the Executive & Finance Committee and the full county board for consideration.

Staff noted the state has a separate licensing/inspection role and that the county does not intend to duplicate state inspections; county fees are meant primarily to ensure local registration and follow-up on complaints.