Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs clearer cooperative purchasing rules, forwards ordinance to county board
Summary
The Marathon County HR, Finance and Property Committee voted to forward proposed revisions to Chapter 3 of the county procurement ordinance that add guidance on cooperative purchasing, bidding thresholds and lease reporting to give staff clearer direction on using consortia and state public-works bidding rules.
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Human Resources, Finance and Property Committee voted to forward revisions to Chapter 3 of Marathon County’s procurement ordinance that clarify how staff may use cooperative purchasing consortia and how those purchases interact with existing bidding thresholds.
Committee members said the changes are intended to give purchasing agents explicit guidance when joining cooperative procurement groups and to align county practice with Wisconsin public-works law. Corporation counsel Jamie (corporation counsel) explained that the proposed edits add a paragraph to section 3.02(d) permitting purchasing agents to join “any cooperative purchasing consortium that is designed and administered for the use and benefit of public or governmental entities,” while requiring committee approval for participation in consortia not primarily serving public entities.
Jamie also described changes in section 3.05 to make clear how cooperative-purchasing prices count toward the county’s quotation and bidding rules: the lowest available price through a single cooperative-purchasing entity may be treated as one quotation or one independent sealed bid/proposal for the purposes of small-purchase and formal-bid thresholds. Jamie said county staff still must solicit additional quotes or go out for bids where statutory or ordinance thresholds require it.
Committee members asked how the ordinance defines “consortium.” Jamie said the paragraph’s wording is intended to mirror a common understanding — an association of entities formed to pursue a shared purchasing benefit — and that staff prefer operational flexibility rather than a narrow statutory definition. Parks Director Polley and Administrator Leonard supported the approach, saying it balances oversight with access to favorable pricing through public consortia such as Sourcewell and Omni.
Supervisor questions focused on whether services counted toward aggregation thresholds and whether the public-works bidding rule in Wisconsin Stat. 66.0901 would apply. Jamie and Administrator Leonard said the public-works language is new to the code to mirror Wisconsin statute and applies to construction projects exceeding $25,000 that must be let to the lowest responsible bidder.
The ordinance draft also adds a leases provision requiring that all executed leases be reported to the finance director and corporation counsel, and it requires consultation with the finance director before entering leases with option-to-purchase terms.
A motion to accept the Chapter 3 revisions and forward them to the full County Board for action was made, seconded and approved without objection.
Background: committee members said earlier procurement language allowed cooperative purchasing but lacked guidance on how to treat consortia prices relative to the county’s solicitation and bid requirements. The revisions are intended to give future purchasing agents clearer, written instruction.
Looking ahead: the County Board will receive the ordinance revision for final consideration and formal adoption. The committee discussion left open whether the Board will request a sharper statutory definition of “consortium,” but staff said they will draft language if the Board requests it.

