Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Speed Cameras School Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates school‑zone signage and recommends shaping speed‑camera policy before rollout
Summary
Members reviewed a draft school‑zone signage letter (to the mayor), favored simplifying signage requests and urged the city to adopt equity-minded rules for any speed‑camera program; no final vote was taken but staff were asked to circulate edits and to consider Vision Zero guidance for camera fund use.
Get email alerts on the Speed Cameras School Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Complete Streets Advisory Committee reviewed a draft letter asking the mayor and common council to standardize school-zone signage ahead of roll‑out of three speed cameras. Members recommended simplifying the sign requests (separating distinct messages such as speed limits, no‑stopping/standing/parking, and pedestrian‑crossing signage) so signs are clear rather than cluttered.
Committee members urged that school zones be consistently marked before camera installation so drivers can see and recognize the zones. One member suggested removing operational traffic-flow requests (for example, routine driveway‑blocking or alternate‑side enforcement language) from the committee’s letter and focusing instead on pedestrian and school‑zone safety signs. The committee asked staff to revert to the January 6 draft of the letter, incorporate a cleaner sign list and circulate the revised version for approval.
Members also discussed the state pilot authorizing speed cameras and how revenue from camera tickets should be used. The committee reviewed a Vision Zero Network document (“Fair Warnings”) recommending that camera revenue be directed to road-safety projects rather than general fund uses, and that implementation include public education and phased enforcement (warnings before fines) to reduce backlash. A committee speaker recommended that any city recommendation emphasize equity in placement and use of funds.
No formal vote was taken. Staff were asked to circulate the cleaned-up school‑zone signage letter and to draft a short set of recommendations — drawing on Vision Zero guidance — about how camera-generated funds should be allocated and how a public education phase should be structured.
Ending: Staff will send the January 6 version of the signage letter for member edits and will prepare recommended camera‑fund spending guidance drawing on Vision Zero resources.

