Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stow City inclusion commission reviews 55 survey responses, plans follow-up outreach on accessibility
Summary
The Stow City Commission on Inclusion reviewed the results of a community accessibility survey and laid out next steps for outreach and information-gathering during a meeting that concluded at 6:02 p.m.
Get email alerts on the Accessibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Stow City Commission on Inclusion reviewed the results of a community accessibility survey and laid out next steps for outreach and information-gathering during a meeting that concluded at 6:02 p.m.
The commission received 55 survey responses and discussed how to increase response rates and collect more detailed, actionable feedback. "So we received 55 results," the meeting facilitator said, summarizing the current total. Members discussed barriers attendees reported at an expo, including reluctance to scan QR codes and the value of having printed flyers and on-site staff to collect information.
Why it matters: Commission members said the survey responses point to immediate, practical accessibility issues — sidewalks, park access, restroom and changing facilities at a planned amphitheater, sensory-room needs, and hearing-assist access at public events — that residents say affect everyday mobility and participation.
Discussion highlights
- Outreach and survey format: Commissioners agreed to refine the current survey into a shorter follow-up questionnaire aimed at producing more detailed answers for prioritized issues and to use paper flyers or small printed QR cards at pop-up events. The commission asked members to email suggested follow-up questions by the 10th of the month so staff can compile them for the next outreach.
- Pop-up events and marketing: Members reported that the commission’s table at a recent expo drew interest but also showed that some attendees would not use QR codes because of scam concerns. "They were concerned ... that there was a scam and they didn't want their information taken," the meeting facilitator said. The group discussed producing an acrylic tabletop sign with commission meeting dates and contact details, and handing out small printed reminders or bookmarks to encourage future participation.
- Access issues identified in responses: Sidewalk continuity and curb access were raised repeatedly; commissioners asked staff to request an update from the public works/planning teams about a larger sidewalk project and upcoming bids. Members also asked staff to check plans for the new amphitheater to confirm whether universal, adjustable changing tables will be included and to request information about accessible routes and surfacing for inclusive playground equipment.
- Sensory and hearing access: Commissioners discussed interest in multi-use "sensory" spaces (examples cited from other communities) and the need for clearer hearing-assist options and signage at public meetings and venues. The commission agreed to explore resources (apps, assistive-listening devices, and existing local services) and to invite an expert or clinic representative to speak at a future meeting.
- Library and community partnerships: The commission noted that Gail, a Stow City Library representative, has agreed to attend an April meeting to discuss library resources and possible collaboration on outreach and resource distribution.
Decisions and directions
- Minutes approval: Commission member Jason moved to approve the minutes from the Feb. 25 meeting; Commission member Elizabeth seconded the motion. The facilitator recorded the motion and second and the minutes were approved.
- Staff follow-up: Staff were asked to (a) compile and circulate narrowed survey questions for review, (b) contact planning/public-works for a sidewalk project update and for amphitheater accessibility details, (c) coordinate with the library about an April appearance, and (d) confirm pop-up registration logistics with Parks & Recreation and provide guidance on signage and whether the commission must provide chairs/tables.
Ending
Members agreed the next practical steps are to refine the survey questions, increase visible, printed outreach materials at pop-ups, and invite planning and library representatives to a future meeting. The meeting facilitator closed the meeting at 6:02 p.m.

