Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Crisis Care All Payer Model topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Witnesses back all‑payer crisis model and insurer parity for Alaska’s crisis continuum
Summary
The committee heard support for SCR 2, which asks the governor to convene stakeholders to recommend an all‑payer funding model for mental‑health crisis services. Testifiers said current Medicaid reimbursement and uneven insurer participation threaten crisis‑care sustainability, especially in rural Alaska.
Senate Concurrent Resolution 2 (SCR 2) — requesting that the governor direct state agencies to convene stakeholders and develop recommendations for an all‑payer crisis continuum of care — drew invited testimony on March 20.
Angela Kimball of Inseparable described the resolution’s purpose: to examine whether emergency mental‑health services can be supported by an all‑payer model similar to how most emergency medical services are reimbursed. “An all payer model essentially spreads costs widely and makes the business of providing these essential services more sustainable,” she said.
Lance Johnson, chief operating officer of the Alaska Behavioral Health Association, argued that Alaska’s crisis continuum — crisis lines, mobile crisis teams, 23‑hour stabilization centers and short‑term residential care — is developing but not financially sustainable under current payer mixes. He testified that Medicaid reimbursement rates have been increased only modestly (he cited a 9% real increase across 2 years for certain services) and said the low rates contributed to closure or unsustainability for programs such as the Bartlett youth crisis stabilization effort. Johnson urged insurer accountability under federal parity rules for behavioral health and questioned which services commercial insurers do not pay for in practice.
Tamar Ben Yosef of A2P2 told the committee that “we are limited in our capacity and cannot fill the gap that is left by the lack of Medicaid coverage and appropriate Medicaid reimbursement for crisis care and behavioral health services,” especially for children who can spend extended periods in emergency departments when no crisis beds are available. Ben Yosef and other witnesses urged state leadership to identify options that include insurer contributions, Medicaid adjustments, and administrative changes to make crisis services sustainable statewide.
The committee set the resolution aside and indicated an intent to bring SCR 2 back for public testimony and further committee consideration on Thursday, March 27.
